The Best App Blockers for Kids' Phones, Compared by Age

We make Unglue, so we have a horse in this race. You will see it in the table, and you will also see where it loses.

If you are searching for an app blocker for kids, you have probably already tried the obvious thing. You set a limit. It held for about four days. Then came the negotiation, the "one more minute", the discovery that your nine-year-old knows your passcode because they watched you type it at the dentist. You are not bad at this. The apps on that phone were built by people whose whole job is keeping a thumb on the screen, and you are one tired adult with a dinner to make.

So this guide judges blockers on one question: does the block still hold on a Wednesday night, without a fight? Below is how blocking actually works on a child's phone, the six tools we would put in front of a parent, what to block in the first place, and how to set it up for a six-year-old versus a fifteen-year-old. The table is a few scrolls down if you want to skip ahead.

Can you actually block apps on a child's phone?

Yes, on both iPhone and Android, and you do not need anything exotic to do it. The built-in tools can already stop an app from opening. The hard part is picking which kind of block you want, because there are three and parents often ask for one while meaning another.

Three kinds of block: permanent, locked, and time-limited

Permanent means the app is gone or cannot launch at all. On iPhone you can hide an app behind Content & Privacy Restrictions or set its age rating ceiling so it never installs. On Android, Family Link can block an app outright or require your approval before it downloads. This is the right answer for a six-year-old and TikTok.

Locked means the app is still there but opens only with a code. Apple's Screen Time passcode and Family Link's parent approval both do this. It works until the code leaks, and codes leak. Ours did. Twice.

Time-limited means the app opens for an allowance and then shuts. This is what most parents of nine-to-fourteen-year-olds actually want: YouTube exists, YouTube ends. Apple's App Limits, Family Link's app timers, Qustodio, and Unglue all live here, and they differ mainly in how easy the limit is to ignore and what happens when it runs out.

Blocking and monitoring do different jobs

A lot of "app blocker for kids" searches are really asking two other questions: "Can I control my daughter's phone from my phone?" and "Is there an app where I can see everything on my child's phone?"

Remote control of the rules is normal and useful. Screen Time through Family Sharing, Family Link, and Qustodio all let you change limits from your own phone, and you should expect that from any paid tool.

Seeing everything is a different category called monitoring. Bark reads messages and flags risky ones. Qustodio and Life360 can show location. These tools have a place, especially for younger kids online for the first time, but they also carry a trust cost that gets steeper every year of adolescence. A fourteen-year-old who finds out you read their texts remembers it longer than any limit you ever set.

Unglue sits firmly on the blocking side. It blocks the apps your kid chose, it makes them earn the unlock, and it cannot read a single message. We built it that way on purpose, and it means it is the wrong tool if message monitoring is what you need.

What the built-in tools already do, and where they stop

Before paying for anything, turn on what you already own.

On iPhone and iPad, Screen Time gives you App Limits, Downtime, Always Allowed apps, and Content & Privacy Restrictions, all manageable from a parent's phone through Family Sharing. It is free and it is a solid first fence. Its weak spots are well known: the Ignore Limit button sits right where a child is weakest, the passcode gets learned, and every few months a parent discovers that Screen Time has not been available for days on their kid's device, the reports have gone quiet, and sometimes the limits have too (we wrote up the 7-day fix for exactly that).

On Android, Google Family Link covers app approvals, daily limits, bedtime, and device lock, also from the parent's phone, also free. Its limits are blunt: the phone locks whole rather than steering the kid toward something better, and older kids can simply ask to graduate out of supervision.

If the built-in fence holds for your family, stop here and spend the money on a pizza. If it does not, keep reading.

How we judged them

Every pick below was scored on the same six things, so the table reads as earned rather than sponsored.

• Does it hold? Can a determined eleven-year-old get past it without the parent's code, and what happens when they try.
• Remote changes. Can you adjust limits from your own phone.
• Schedules and per-app limits. Bedtime and homework windows, and limits on single apps rather than the whole device.
• A real free tier. Free with a watermark of nagging does not count.
• Something to do instead. Whether the tool only removes the app or also points the child at a better choice. This one is our bias, named out loud.
• The child's data. What the tool collects and who can see it.

The best app blockers for kids in 2026

Unglue

Unglue goes on your kid's phone, and the first thing it asks them to do is pick the apps that eat their time. Those apps stay blocked by default. To open one, the kid earns Coins by finishing a habit the app can verify: a photo of the made bed, a step count from a walk, a timed homework session. One Coin buys one minute. Each day starts with an allowance set by the difficulty level, and on Hard it starts at zero.

That mechanism is the whole point. Most blockers put a wall between the child and the app. Unglue puts twenty minutes of real life there instead, and the kid chose the wall. In our own homes that difference is what made the block survive past Wednesday.

The parent's lever is Selection Lock. Turn it on, and nothing comes off the restricted list without a Buddy Code that you hold. Adding apps to the list is always allowed. Only removing them is gated.

Where it loses: there is no dashboard on your phone showing their day, it cannot read messages or filter the web, and it does not know where they are. Many families run it alongside Screen Time or Family Link, which is fine, since on iPhone it uses the same Apple framework. It runs on iPhone and Android, is free to download, and needs a Plus subscription for full features, which Apple Family Sharing covers across the household on iPhone.

Apple Screen Time

The best free option on iPhone and iPad, and the one to try before anything else. App Limits per app or category, Downtime for the evening, Content & Privacy Restrictions for ratings and web content, and remote management from a parent's phone through Family Sharing.

Where it loses: the one-tap Ignore Limit, the passcode your kid eventually learns, and the stretches where it quietly stops reporting. Treat it as the fence, and expect to add a gate.

Google Family Link

The best free option on Android. You approve app installs, set daily limits and bedtimes, lock the device from your phone, and see where it is. For a first phone it is genuinely good.

Where it loses: limits apply to the device more than the behaviour, so the phone becomes a brick at 8pm rather than a phone with a quiet YouTube. And supervision for teens is a choice the teen can end, which makes it a poor long-term fence for a fifteen-year-old.

Qustodio

The pick for households with an iPhone, an Android tablet, and a Windows laptop all in play. Qustodio puts app blocking, web filtering, time limits, and activity reports under one parent account across all of them.

Where it loses: it is a subscription, setup takes an evening, and kids know they are being watched, which is either a feature or a cost depending on the child. It leans monitoring.

Bark

Bark is the tool when your worry is what is coming in rather than how long they are on it. It scans texts, email, and many apps for signs of bullying, predators, self-harm, and explicit content, then alerts you. It also has screen time schedules and web filtering, but those are the side dish.

Where it loses: as a pure app blocker it is average, and its whole value depends on reading your child's messages, which is a decision to make with eyes open.

Bark vs Life360: they do different jobs

Parents ask "Is Life360 or Bark better?" often enough that it showed up in the search data for this article. The honest answer is that they do not compete. Life360 shares location and driving data within a family circle. Bark reads content and raises alerts. Neither one is an app blocker in the sense this article means.

The related question, "Is Life360 a red flag?", comes from teenagers, and it is worth hearing. Location tracking a sixteen-year-old without their agreement reads to them as distrust, and it tends to produce the exact hiding it was meant to prevent. If you use it, agree on it together. We are writing a separate guide on reducing screen time for teens without wrecking the relationship, because that conversation deserves more than a paragraph.

The best free app blocker for kids

On iPhone: Apple Screen Time. On Android: Google Family Link. Both are free, both are managed from your phone, and both are better than most paid blockers were five years ago. Unglue is free to download and lets your kid start building habits before you decide on Plus.

Which apps are worth blocking?

An app blocker is only as useful as the list you give it. For most families the list is short: short-form video, one or two games, and whichever messaging app is running the group chat at 11pm.

Is TikTok safe for a 10-year-old?

TikTok's own rules say thirteen and up. In the US, under-thirteens get a separate, limited experience with curated video and no messaging. A ten-year-old with a full account is on it against the platform's terms, usually because they entered a different birth year, and that is the first thing to fix. If your child is thirteen and older, TikTok's Family Pairing lets you link your account to theirs and set a daily limit, restricted mode, and who can message them. Pair that with a blocker so the limit has teeth.

Snapchat vs TikTok: which carries more risk?

They are risky in different directions. TikTok's risk is the feed: an algorithm tuned to keep a child watching, and a stream of content you did not pick. Snapchat's risk is the contact: disappearing messages, strangers who can add your child, and a map that can show where they are. For younger kids, the contact risk is the more serious one. For a teen who struggles to put the phone down, the feed is. Block based on which problem your child actually has.

Why so many parents say no to TikTok, and what to offer instead

Most "no" decisions come down to the feed being endless and the time disappearing. Saying no works better when something arrives in its place. In our homes the swap that stuck was boring on paper: a fixed thirty minutes of YouTube after homework, earned, with a timer the kid set themselves. The no had a shape. It was a shape they chose.

Blocking content, not just apps

Branch two of the problem: an app blocker stops TikTok, and your child opens the browser.

How to block inappropriate content on a child's phone

On iPhone, Screen Time's Content & Privacy Restrictions can limit adult websites or allow only a list you approve, and the same section sets age ratings for apps, music, and films. On Android, Family Link filters Chrome and sets SafeSearch, and Google Play's parental controls set content ratings. For a wider net across every device on the home network, a filtering DNS such as a family-safe resolver on the router catches a lot with one setting. We will publish a step-by-step guide to blocking websites for your child; for now, start with the built-in filters above, since they are free and already on the phone.

Does an app blocker catch sexting or risky messages?

No. A blocker limits access to apps and sites. It does not read what passes through them. If that is the worry, you are looking for a monitoring tool such as Bark, and you are also looking at a conversation with your child about why. Both are legitimate. They are just different from blocking, and a tool that promises to do everything usually does the blocking part worst.

Setting up a blocker by age

The right setup changes more with age than with device.

Ages 5 to 8: fewer apps, device locked, parent holds the code

Keep the app list tiny and approve every install. Use permanent blocks rather than timers, because a timer invites negotiation and a missing app does not. Hold the passcode and never type it where they can see. Screen Time or Family Link alone is usually enough here.

Ages 9 to 12: time windows and a replacement for every block

This is where limits start failing and the arguing starts. Switch from "no" to "when": YouTube after homework, games on weekends, nothing after 8pm. For every app you limit, name what goes in the slot, out loud, before the limit hits. This is the age where Unglue starts to earn its place, because the kid is old enough to choose their own restricted list and to feel good about earning the unlock.

Teens: agree the rules together, use the blocker as a commitment device

By fourteen, a blocker imposed from above becomes a puzzle to solve. A blocker the teen set up themselves becomes a tool they defend. Sit down together, let them pick the apps and the limits, and have the tool hold them to it. Selection Lock exists exactly for this: the teen owns the list, you hold the code that would shrink it, and nobody has to be the police at 10pm. Our help entry on older teens covers how families use it as a shared agreement.

What to do today

Pick the single app that causes the most friction in your house. Block it for one window, tonight, using whatever tool you already have on the phone. Then say out loud what happens in that window instead. Pick one app and one window, and name what fills it. Everything else in this article can wait a week.

Not sure which setup fits your child?

Answer a few questions about your child and get a plan that fits your family.

Start Free 5-Minute Quiz

Join 50,000 families ungluing right now.

Common questions

How do I permanently block an app on my child's phone?

On iPhone, open Screen Time, go to Content & Privacy Restrictions, and either lower the allowed app age rating below the app's rating or remove the app and block installs. On Android, open Family Link, find the app under Controls, and block it; you can also require approval for new installs. A permanent block is the right tool for young children. For older kids, a time limit with a reason attached tends to last longer.

Can I lock an app so I can't use it myself?

Yes, and plenty of parents end up doing this after setting up their kid's phone and noticing their own screen time. Screen Time and Digital Wellbeing both offer self-limits, though they are easy to override. Unglue works the same way on an adult's phone as on a kid's: pick the apps, earn the minutes. We use it ourselves, which is where most of the ideas in this article came from.

Will my kid just uninstall the blocker?

They might try. On iPhone, Screen Time can block app deletion entirely. On Android, Family Link can require approval to uninstall. Unglue uses Apple's Screen Time framework on iPhone, and with Selection Lock on, shrinking the restricted list needs your Buddy Code. The more durable protection is the one in the previous section: a teen who helped choose the rules has less reason to tear them down.

Final take

The blocker that works is the one that holds without making you the villain. For a young child that is a permanent block and a passcode they never see. For a teenager it is a tool they chose, with a lock only you can open. For the years in between, it is a limit with something better waiting on the other side of it.

For us, that something better is the whole idea behind Unglue: the app stays blocked until the kid has earned the minutes with real life, and they feel the trade every time. We built it because we kept losing the same argument with our own phones.

Try Unglue for your family